임플란트 고정성 보철물 수복을 위한 최소 교합 고경에 대한 고찰
Consideration of Minimal Interocclusal Distance for Implant-supported Prosthesis
김승민, 최순호, 송영우, 강주현, 차재국, 이중석, 박영범, 정의원,
소속 상세정보
김승민 ( Kim Seung-Min ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
최순호 ( Choe Sun-Ho ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
송영우 ( Song Young-Woo ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
강주현 ( Kang Joo-Hyun ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
차재국 ( Cha Jae-Kook ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
이중석 ( Lee Jung-Seok ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
박영범 ( Park Young-Bum ) - 연세대학교 치과대학 보철과학교실
정의원 ( Jung Ui-Won ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
KMID : 0602720170210010054
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this review is to exmanine the minimal interocclusal distance required for implant placement for each implant manufacturer without surgery.
Materials and methods: “Minimal interocclusal distance” was defined as the distance from the edentulous alveolar crest to the functional cusp of the opposing teeth or to the contact surface facing the central fossa of implant prosthesis. 15 journals were searched by “Pubmed”, and specifications were inquired by manufacturer.
Result: Implants were classified into bone level and soft-tissue level implant. The bone level was divided into external connection type and internal connection type. Implants were categorized into cement-retention type and screw-retention type according to the fastening method of the prosthesis. For the cement-retention type, the bone level implant required 6 mm interocclusal distance and the soft-tissue level implant 8 mm, regardless of manufacturer. For the screwretention type, minimal interocclusal distance were 1.5~4.5 mm for internal connection type, 3.65~4.5 mm for external connection type, 4.3~6.5 mm soft-tissue level implant.
Conclusion: There were differences in each manufacturer, but implantation can be performed when the minimum interocclusal distance of 1.5 mm is secured.
키워드
Implant; Implant prosthesis; Interocclusal distance; Minimal interocclusal distance
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보